Liberia vs Sudan: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Liberia
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 4.49 kg/ha against 4 kg/ha in Liberia, a difference of 0.49 kg/ha.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Liberia's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Liberia ranks 176th and Sudan ranks 173rd of 200 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.95 kg/ha | 4.63 kg/ha | 0.6753 kg/ha | Sudan |
| 2020s | 3.99 kg/ha | 4.51 kg/ha | 0.5212 kg/ha | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Liberia or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 4.49 kg/ha against 4 kg/ha in Liberia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Liberia and Sudan?
- 0.49 kg/ha, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Liberia and Sudan rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Liberia ranks 176th and Sudan ranks 173rd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).