Libya vs Niger: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Libya
- Niger
How they compare
Niger currently reports 2.22 kg/ha against 2.18 kg/ha in Libya, a difference of 0.04 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Niger ahead.
Libya ranks 192nd and Niger ranks 190th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 3 and Niger in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.5862 kg/ha | 0.7867 kg/ha | 0.2005 kg/ha | Niger |
| 1970s | 0.8347 kg/ha | 1.03 kg/ha | 0.1935 kg/ha | Niger |
| 1980s | 1.12 kg/ha | 1.15 kg/ha | 0.0229 kg/ha | Niger |
| 1990s | 1.29 kg/ha | 1 kg/ha | 0.2862 kg/ha | Libya |
| 2000s | 1.57 kg/ha | 1.41 kg/ha | 0.1656 kg/ha | Libya |
| 2010s | 2.09 kg/ha | 1.71 kg/ha | 0.3843 kg/ha | Libya |
| 2020s | 2.14 kg/ha | 2.19 kg/ha | 0.0419 kg/ha | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Libya or Niger?
- Niger, at 2.22 kg/ha against 2.18 kg/ha in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Libya and Niger?
- 0.04 kg/ha, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Niger?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Niger rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Libya ranks 192nd and Niger ranks 190th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).