Luxembourg vs Republic of Korea: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Luxembourg
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 92.89 kg/ha against 79.56 kg/ha in Republic of Korea, a difference of 13.33 kg/ha.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.2 times Republic of Korea's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Luxembourg ranks 17th and Republic of Korea ranks 20th of 185 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.38 kg/ha | 44.71 kg/ha | 46.67 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 93.37 kg/ha | 63.7 kg/ha | 29.66 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 93.61 kg/ha | 77.53 kg/ha | 16.08 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Luxembourg or Republic of Korea?
- Luxembourg, at 92.89 kg/ha against 79.56 kg/ha in Republic of Korea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Luxembourg and Republic of Korea?
- 13.33 kg/ha, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Republic of Korea?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Republic of Korea rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Luxembourg ranks 17th and Republic of Korea ranks 20th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).