Malta vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area

Malta
128.75 kg/ha
in 2023
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
12.13 kg/ha
in 2023
Malta rank
15th
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
18th

Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Malta
  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
050100150200196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 128.75 kg/ha against 12.13 kg/ha in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), a difference of 116.62 kg/ha.

That makes Malta's figure about 10.6 times Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 15th and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 18th of 200 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 54.02 kg/ha 6.31 kg/ha 47.71 kg/ha Malta
1970s 83.83 kg/ha 7.11 kg/ha 76.72 kg/ha Malta
1980s 117.53 kg/ha 7.93 kg/ha 109.6 kg/ha Malta
1990s 167.03 kg/ha 8.88 kg/ha 158.16 kg/ha Malta
2000s 183.97 kg/ha 10.21 kg/ha 173.76 kg/ha Malta
2010s 124.56 kg/ha 11.51 kg/ha 113.05 kg/ha Malta
2020s 126.93 kg/ha 11.98 kg/ha 114.95 kg/ha Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Malta or Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
Malta, at 128.75 kg/ha against 12.13 kg/ha in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Malta and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
116.62 kg/ha, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malta and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
Malta ranks 15th and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 18th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/malta/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/malta/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/">Malta vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
232 places, 13,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).