Montenegro vs Northern Europe: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Montenegro
- Northern Europe
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 412.61 kg/ha against 43.71 kg/ha in Northern Europe, a difference of 368.9 kg/ha.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 9.4 times Northern Europe's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Montenegro ranks 3rd and Northern Europe ranks 2nd of 185 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Northern Europe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 635.75 kg/ha | 48.93 kg/ha | 586.82 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 513.88 kg/ha | 46.59 kg/ha | 467.29 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 421.05 kg/ha | 44.81 kg/ha | 376.25 kg/ha | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Montenegro or Northern Europe?
- Montenegro, at 412.61 kg/ha against 43.71 kg/ha in Northern Europe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Montenegro and Northern Europe?
- 368.9 kg/ha, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Northern Europe?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Montenegro and Northern Europe rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Montenegro ranks 3rd and Northern Europe ranks 2nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).