Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Uzbekistan, Republic of: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
12.13 kg/ha
in 2023
Uzbekistan, Republic of
107.47 kg/ha
in 2023
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
8th
Uzbekistan, Republic of rank
15th

Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
  • Uzbekistan, Republic of
0255075100196119922023

How they compare

Uzbekistan, Republic of currently reports 107.47 kg/ha against 12.13 kg/ha in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), a difference of 95.34 kg/ha.

That makes Uzbekistan, Republic of's figure about 8.9 times Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)'s.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Uzbekistan, Republic of has been ahead every year.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 8th and Uzbekistan, Republic of ranks 15th of 10 groups.

Uzbekistan, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) Uzbekistan, Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 8.98 kg/ha 38.03 kg/ha 29.05 kg/ha Uzbekistan, Republic of
2000s 10.21 kg/ha 46.33 kg/ha 36.12 kg/ha Uzbekistan, Republic of
2010s 11.51 kg/ha 82.16 kg/ha 70.65 kg/ha Uzbekistan, Republic of
2020s 11.98 kg/ha 103.93 kg/ha 91.95 kg/ha Uzbekistan, Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) or Uzbekistan, Republic of?
Uzbekistan, Republic of, at 107.47 kg/ha against 12.13 kg/ha in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Uzbekistan, Republic of?
95.34 kg/ha, with Uzbekistan, Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Uzbekistan, Republic of?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Uzbekistan, Republic of rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 8th and Uzbekistan, Republic of ranks 15th of 10 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Uzbekistan, Republic of: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/uzbekistan/">Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Uzbekistan, Republic of: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
232 places, 13,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).