New Zealand vs South Sudan: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- New Zealand
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 27.38 kg/ha against 26.96 kg/ha in New Zealand, a difference of 0.42 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 63rd and South Sudan ranks 61st of 185 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 28.87 kg/ha | 24.1 kg/ha | 4.77 kg/ha | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 26.4 kg/ha | 27.6 kg/ha | 1.2 kg/ha | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, New Zealand or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 27.38 kg/ha against 26.96 kg/ha in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between New Zealand and South Sudan?
- 0.42 kg/ha, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do New Zealand and South Sudan rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- New Zealand ranks 63rd and South Sudan ranks 61st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).