Russian Federation vs Uganda: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Russian Federation
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 8.86 kg/ha against 8.55 kg/ha in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.31 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Russian Federation ranks 136th and Uganda ranks 134th of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Russian Federation averaged higher in 3 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 16.57 kg/ha | 3.62 kg/ha | 12.95 kg/ha | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 10.32 kg/ha | 4.91 kg/ha | 5.41 kg/ha | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 8.94 kg/ha | 7.04 kg/ha | 1.9 kg/ha | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 8.59 kg/ha | 8.73 kg/ha | 0.1434 kg/ha | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Russian Federation or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 8.86 kg/ha against 8.55 kg/ha in Russian Federation as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Russian Federation and Uganda?
- 0.31 kg/ha, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Uganda?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Russian Federation and Uganda rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Russian Federation ranks 136th and Uganda ranks 134th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).