Slovakia vs Saint Lucia: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Slovakia
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 18.51 kg/ha against 17.71 kg/ha in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.8 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Slovakia ahead.
Slovakia ranks 88th and Saint Lucia ranks 91st of 185 countries.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovakia | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 37.73 kg/ha | 11.62 kg/ha | 26.1 kg/ha | Slovakia |
| 2000s | 26.9 kg/ha | 19.04 kg/ha | 7.87 kg/ha | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 20.85 kg/ha | 19.93 kg/ha | 0.9153 kg/ha | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 18.78 kg/ha | 17.68 kg/ha | 1.1 kg/ha | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Slovakia or Saint Lucia?
- Slovakia, at 18.51 kg/ha against 17.71 kg/ha in Saint Lucia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Slovakia and Saint Lucia?
- 0.8 kg/ha, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovakia and Saint Lucia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Slovakia and Saint Lucia rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Slovakia ranks 88th and Saint Lucia ranks 91st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).