Slovenia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Slovenia
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 78.08 kg/ha against 76.24 kg/ha in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 1.84 kg/ha.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.
Slovenia ranks 21st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 22nd of 185 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 117.78 kg/ha | 30.14 kg/ha | 87.64 kg/ha | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 104.73 kg/ha | 62.1 kg/ha | 42.63 kg/ha | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 83.58 kg/ha | 70.06 kg/ha | 13.52 kg/ha | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 81.03 kg/ha | 75.64 kg/ha | 5.4 kg/ha | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Slovenia or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Slovenia, at 78.08 kg/ha against 76.24 kg/ha in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Slovenia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 1.84 kg/ha, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Slovenia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Slovenia ranks 21st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 22nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).