Sri Lanka vs Sudan: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Sri Lanka
- Sudan
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 4.6 kg/ha against 4.49 kg/ha in Sudan, a difference of 0.11 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 171st and Sudan ranks 173rd of 200 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.93 kg/ha | 4.63 kg/ha | 0.2991 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 5.02 kg/ha | 4.51 kg/ha | 0.5054 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Sri Lanka or Sudan?
- Sri Lanka, at 4.6 kg/ha against 4.49 kg/ha in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Sri Lanka and Sudan?
- 0.11 kg/ha, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Sri Lanka and Sudan rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Sri Lanka ranks 171st and Sudan ranks 173rd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).