Sri Lanka vs Togo: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Sri Lanka
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 4.69 kg/ha against 4.6 kg/ha in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.09 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 171st and Togo ranks 168th of 200 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9.97 kg/ha | 1.22 kg/ha | 8.75 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 8.74 kg/ha | 1.4 kg/ha | 7.33 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 10.09 kg/ha | 1.49 kg/ha | 8.6 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 8.73 kg/ha | 1.84 kg/ha | 6.89 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 5.26 kg/ha | 2.25 kg/ha | 3.01 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 5.01 kg/ha | 3.45 kg/ha | 1.56 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 5.02 kg/ha | 4.5 kg/ha | 0.52 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Sri Lanka or Togo?
- Togo, at 4.69 kg/ha against 4.6 kg/ha in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Sri Lanka and Togo?
- 0.09 kg/ha, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Togo?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Sri Lanka and Togo rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Sri Lanka ranks 171st and Togo ranks 168th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).