Switzerland vs Uzbekistan: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Switzerland
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Switzerland currently reports 153.48 kg/ha against 107.47 kg/ha in Uzbekistan, a difference of 46.01 kg/ha.
That makes Switzerland's figure about 1.4 times Uzbekistan's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Switzerland has been ahead every year.
Switzerland ranks 13th and Uzbekistan ranks 15th of 185 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Switzerland | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 178.27 kg/ha | 38.03 kg/ha | 140.24 kg/ha | Switzerland |
| 2000s | 165.15 kg/ha | 46.33 kg/ha | 118.82 kg/ha | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 159.94 kg/ha | 82.16 kg/ha | 77.78 kg/ha | Switzerland |
| 2020s | 153.97 kg/ha | 103.93 kg/ha | 50.04 kg/ha | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Switzerland or Uzbekistan?
- Switzerland, at 153.48 kg/ha against 107.47 kg/ha in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Switzerland and Uzbekistan?
- 46.01 kg/ha, with Switzerland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Switzerland and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Switzerland and Uzbekistan rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Switzerland ranks 13th and Uzbekistan ranks 15th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).