Afghanistan vs Malawi: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Afghanistan
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 79,934 t against 79,285 t in Afghanistan, a difference of 649 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 57th and Malawi ranks 56th of 200 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 61,664 t | 1,930 t | 59,735 t | Afghanistan |
| 1970s | 61,893 t | 2,688 t | 59,206 t | Afghanistan |
| 1980s | 50,700 t | 3,562 t | 47,138 t | Afghanistan |
| 1990s | 52,658 t | 4,333 t | 48,325 t | Afghanistan |
| 2000s | 60,942 t | 7,842 t | 53,100 t | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 80,412 t | 34,058 t | 46,354 t | Afghanistan |
| 2020s | 78,567 t | 72,186 t | 6,382 t | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Afghanistan or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 79,934 t against 79,285 t in Afghanistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Afghanistan and Malawi?
- 649 t, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Malawi?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Afghanistan and Malawi rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Afghanistan ranks 57th and Malawi ranks 56th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).