Africa vs Poland: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Africa
- Poland
How they compare
Africa currently reports 1.46 million t against 357,989 t in Poland, a difference of 1.10 million t.
That makes Africa's figure about 4.1 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Poland ahead.
Africa ranks 18th and Poland ranks 16th of 32 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Africa averaged higher in 4 and Poland in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Africa | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 345,000 t | 598,006 t | 253,006 t | Poland |
| 1970s | 420,043 t | 706,214 t | 286,170 t | Poland |
| 1980s | 531,108 t | 646,986 t | 115,878 t | Poland |
| 1990s | 678,869 t | 482,970 t | 195,898 t | Africa |
| 2000s | 910,960 t | 378,099 t | 532,861 t | Africa |
| 2010s | 1.23 million t | 353,233 t | 873,061 t | Africa |
| 2020s | 1.42 million t | 359,693 t | 1.06 million t | Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Africa or Poland?
- Africa, at 1.46 million t against 357,989 t in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Africa and Poland?
- 1.10 million t, with Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Africa and Poland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Africa and Poland rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Africa ranks 18th and Poland ranks 16th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).