Africa vs Yugoslav SFR: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Africa
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Africa currently reports 1.46 million t against 363,561 t in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 1.09 million t.
That makes Africa's figure about 4.0 times Yugoslav SFR's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Yugoslav SFR ahead.
Africa ranks 18th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 15th of 32 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Africa averaged higher in 3 and Yugoslav SFR in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Africa | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 345,000 t | 364,925 t | 19,925 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 420,043 t | 402,319 t | 17,724 t | Africa |
| 1980s | 531,108 t | 408,956 t | 122,152 t | Africa |
| 1990s | 628,379 t | 369,599 t | 258,780 t | Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Africa or Yugoslav SFR?
- Africa, at 1.46 million t against 363,561 t in Yugoslav SFR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Africa and Yugoslav SFR?
- 1.09 million t, with Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Africa and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Africa and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Africa ranks 18th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 15th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).