Algeria vs El Salvador: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Algeria
- El Salvador
How they compare
Algeria currently reports 22,039 t against 21,535 t in El Salvador, a difference of 504 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.
Algeria ranks 92nd and El Salvador ranks 93rd of 184 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Algeria averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4,819 t | 14,146 t | 9,326 t | El Salvador |
| 1970s | 7,080 t | 16,671 t | 9,592 t | El Salvador |
| 1980s | 10,614 t | 15,761 t | 5,146 t | El Salvador |
| 1990s | 12,858 t | 17,344 t | 4,485 t | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 15,658 t | 19,269 t | 3,611 t | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 19,896 t | 16,698 t | 3,197 t | Algeria |
| 2020s | 21,534 t | 21,544 t | 9.65 t | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Algeria or El Salvador?
- Algeria, at 22,039 t against 21,535 t in El Salvador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Algeria and El Salvador?
- 504 t, with Algeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and El Salvador?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Algeria and El Salvador rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Algeria ranks 92nd and El Salvador ranks 93rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).