Americas vs Russian Federation: Manure applied β Cropland potassium
Manure applied β Cropland potassium over time
- Americas
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Americas currently reports 5.15 million t against 1.06 million t in Russian Federation, a difference of 4.10 million t.
That makes Americas's figure about 4.9 times Russian Federation's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Americas has been ahead every year.
Americas ranks 4th and Russian Federation ranks 6th of 32 groups.
Americas has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Americas | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.77 million t | 2.15 million t | 2.62 million t | Americas |
| 2000s | 5.05 million t | 1.28 million t | 3.77 million t | Americas |
| 2010s | 5.24 million t | 1.10 million t | 4.14 million t | Americas |
| 2020s | 5.14 million t | 1.06 million t | 4.08 million t | Americas |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied β cropland potassium, Americas or Russian Federation?
- Americas, at 5.15 million t against 1.06 million t in Russian Federation as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied β cropland potassium between Americas and Russian Federation?
- 4.10 million t, with Americas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Americas and Russian Federation?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Americas and Russian Federation rank globally for manure applied β cropland potassium?
- Americas ranks 4th and Russian Federation ranks 6th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).