Armenia vs Puerto Rico: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Armenia
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 3,735 t against 3,248 t in Armenia, a difference of 487 t.
That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 1.2 times Armenia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 147th and Puerto Rico ranks 144th of 200 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,580 t | 7,046 t | 4,466 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2000s | 2,816 t | 5,939 t | 3,123 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 3,380 t | 4,618 t | 1,239 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 3,539 t | 3,926 t | 387.04 t | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Armenia or Puerto Rico?
- Puerto Rico, at 3,735 t against 3,248 t in Armenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Armenia and Puerto Rico?
- 487 t, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Puerto Rico?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Puerto Rico rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Armenia ranks 147th and Puerto Rico ranks 144th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).