Australia and New Zealand vs Belarus: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Belarus
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 184,331 t against 181,302 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 3,029 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 29th and Belarus ranks 28th of 185 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 165,028 t | 234,618 t | 69,591 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 177,238 t | 179,939 t | 2,700 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 172,171 t | 189,225 t | 17,054 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 163,770 t | 185,167 t | 21,397 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Australia and New Zealand or Belarus?
- Belarus, at 184,331 t against 181,302 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Australia and New Zealand and Belarus?
- 3,029 t, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Belarus?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Belarus rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 29th and Belarus ranks 28th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).