Austria vs Tajikistan: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Austria
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Austria currently reports 97,808 t against 93,373 t in Tajikistan, a difference of 4,435 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Austria has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 48th and Tajikistan ranks 51st of 200 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 129,503 t | 41,495 t | 88,007 t | Austria |
| 2000s | 111,592 t | 48,790 t | 62,801 t | Austria |
| 2010s | 105,256 t | 81,030 t | 24,226 t | Austria |
| 2020s | 99,681 t | 93,946 t | 5,736 t | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Austria or Tajikistan?
- Austria, at 97,808 t against 93,373 t in Tajikistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Austria and Tajikistan?
- 4,435 t, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Tajikistan rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Austria ranks 48th and Tajikistan ranks 51st of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).