Azerbaijan vs Sri Lanka: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Azerbaijan
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 11,796 t against 11,427 t in Azerbaijan, a difference of 369 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 127th and Sri Lanka ranks 125th of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11,529 t | 15,990 t | 4,460 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 13,191 t | 10,422 t | 2,768 t | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 13,796 t | 11,540 t | 2,256 t | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 11,992 t | 12,130 t | 138.2 t | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Azerbaijan or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 11,796 t against 11,427 t in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Azerbaijan and Sri Lanka?
- 369 t, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Sri Lanka?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Sri Lanka rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Azerbaijan ranks 127th and Sri Lanka ranks 125th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).