Belarus vs Kazakhstan: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Belarus
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 207,340 t against 184,331 t in Belarus, a difference of 23,009 t.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Belarus ranks 28th and Kazakhstan ranks 25th of 185 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 234,618 t | 258,866 t | 24,247 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 179,939 t | 185,770 t | 5,831 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 189,225 t | 220,437 t | 31,212 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 185,167 t | 204,786 t | 19,619 t | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Belarus or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 207,340 t against 184,331 t in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Belarus and Kazakhstan?
- 23,009 t, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Kazakhstan rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Belarus ranks 28th and Kazakhstan ranks 25th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).