Belarus vs Middle Africa: Manure applied β Cropland potassium
Manure applied β Cropland potassium over time
- Belarus
- Middle Africa
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 184,331 t against 169,237 t in Middle Africa, a difference of 15,094 t.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Middle Africa's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 30th and Middle Africa ranks 27th of 200 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Middle Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 234,618 t | 66,255 t | 168,363 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 179,939 t | 87,324 t | 92,615 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 189,225 t | 129,577 t | 59,648 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 185,167 t | 159,887 t | 25,280 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied β cropland potassium, Belarus or Middle Africa?
- Belarus, at 184,331 t against 169,237 t in Middle Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied β cropland potassium between Belarus and Middle Africa?
- 15,094 t, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Middle Africa?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Middle Africa rank globally for manure applied β cropland potassium?
- Belarus ranks 30th and Middle Africa ranks 27th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).