Belarus vs Southern Africa: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Belarus
- Southern Africa
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 184,331 t against 44,559 t in Southern Africa, a difference of 139,772 t.
That makes Belarus's figure about 4.1 times Southern Africa's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 28th and Southern Africa ranks 28th of 184 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Southern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 234,618 t | 45,425 t | 189,194 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 179,939 t | 48,471 t | 131,468 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 189,225 t | 47,780 t | 141,445 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 185,167 t | 44,027 t | 141,140 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Belarus or Southern Africa?
- Belarus, at 184,331 t against 44,559 t in Southern Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Belarus and Southern Africa?
- 139,772 t, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Southern Africa?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Southern Africa rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Belarus ranks 28th and Southern Africa ranks 28th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).