Belgium vs Nigeria: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Belgium
- Nigeria
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 149,403 t against 145,540 t in Belgium, a difference of 3,863 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 40th and Nigeria ranks 39th of 200 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 169,045 t | 97,919 t | 71,126 t | Belgium |
| 2010s | 156,042 t | 123,001 t | 33,041 t | Belgium |
| 2020s | 150,637 t | 146,970 t | 3,668 t | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Belgium or Nigeria?
- Nigeria, at 149,403 t against 145,540 t in Belgium as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Belgium and Nigeria?
- 3,863 t, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Nigeria?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Nigeria rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Belgium ranks 40th and Nigeria ranks 39th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).