Belize vs New Caledonia: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Belize
- New Caledonia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 708.82 t against 695.68 t in Belize, a difference of 13.14 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.
Belize ranks 174th and New Caledonia ranks 173rd of 200 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 302.29 t | 718.2 t | 415.91 t | New Caledonia |
| 1970s | 370.24 t | 784.63 t | 414.39 t | New Caledonia |
| 1980s | 486.93 t | 865.33 t | 378.39 t | New Caledonia |
| 1990s | 432.17 t | 807.14 t | 374.98 t | New Caledonia |
| 2000s | 479.32 t | 774.64 t | 295.33 t | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 631.14 t | 735.81 t | 104.67 t | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 688.58 t | 715.3 t | 26.72 t | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Belize or New Caledonia?
- New Caledonia, at 708.82 t against 695.68 t in Belize as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Belize and New Caledonia?
- 13.14 t, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and New Caledonia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Belize and New Caledonia rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Belize ranks 174th and New Caledonia ranks 173rd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).