Bhutan vs Lesotho: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Bhutan
- Lesotho
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 2,043 t against 1,938 t in Lesotho, a difference of 105 t.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lesotho ahead.
Bhutan ranks 155th and Lesotho ranks 157th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 2 and Lesotho in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,450 t | 1,618 t | 168.14 t | Lesotho |
| 1970s | 1,804 t | 1,992 t | 188.24 t | Lesotho |
| 1980s | 2,358 t | 2,113 t | 244.9 t | Bhutan |
| 1990s | 1,856 t | 2,142 t | 286.25 t | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 1,829 t | 2,863 t | 1,034 t | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 2,158 t | 2,368 t | 210.3 t | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 2,230 t | 1,920 t | 310.33 t | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Bhutan or Lesotho?
- Bhutan, at 2,043 t against 1,938 t in Lesotho as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Bhutan and Lesotho?
- 105 t, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Lesotho?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Lesotho rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Bhutan ranks 155th and Lesotho ranks 157th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).