Botswana vs Malta: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Botswana
- Malta
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 1,278 t against 1,067 t in Malta, a difference of 211 t.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.2 times Malta's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 165th and Malta ranks 167th of 200 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,377 t | 801.63 t | 1,576 t | Botswana |
| 1970s | 3,489 t | 1,155 t | 2,334 t | Botswana |
| 1980s | 4,148 t | 1,528 t | 2,620 t | Botswana |
| 1990s | 2,809 t | 1,892 t | 917.33 t | Botswana |
| 2000s | 2,504 t | 1,761 t | 742.96 t | Botswana |
| 2010s | 1,965 t | 1,285 t | 679.98 t | Botswana |
| 2020s | 1,289 t | 1,108 t | 181.02 t | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Botswana or Malta?
- Botswana, at 1,278 t against 1,067 t in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Botswana and Malta?
- 211 t, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Malta?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Malta rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Botswana ranks 165th and Malta ranks 167th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).