Bulgaria vs Cuba: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Bulgaria
- Cuba
How they compare
Bulgaria currently reports 37,070 t against 33,924 t in Cuba, a difference of 3,146 t.
That makes Bulgaria's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bulgaria ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 85th and Cuba ranks 88th of 200 countries.
Bulgaria has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 135,904 t | 44,629 t | 91,276 t | Bulgaria |
| 1970s | 143,549 t | 45,502 t | 98,046 t | Bulgaria |
| 1980s | 158,373 t | 48,170 t | 110,203 t | Bulgaria |
| 1990s | 87,139 t | 44,831 t | 42,308 t | Bulgaria |
| 2000s | 52,594 t | 39,331 t | 13,263 t | Bulgaria |
| 2010s | 41,161 t | 38,070 t | 3,091 t | Bulgaria |
| 2020s | 38,863 t | 30,819 t | 8,044 t | Bulgaria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Bulgaria or Cuba?
- Bulgaria, at 37,070 t against 33,924 t in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Bulgaria and Cuba?
- 3,146 t, with Bulgaria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Cuba?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bulgaria and Cuba rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Bulgaria ranks 85th and Cuba ranks 88th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).