Burkina Faso vs Cuba: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Burkina Faso
- Cuba
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 36,740 t against 33,924 t in Cuba, a difference of 2,816 t.
That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 78th and Cuba ranks 80th of 184 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Cuba in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5,884 t | 44,629 t | 38,745 t | Cuba |
| 1970s | 7,127 t | 45,502 t | 38,375 t | Cuba |
| 1980s | 11,453 t | 48,170 t | 36,717 t | Cuba |
| 1990s | 17,900 t | 44,831 t | 26,930 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 31,619 t | 39,331 t | 7,712 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 42,036 t | 38,070 t | 3,967 t | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 36,355 t | 30,819 t | 5,536 t | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Burkina Faso or Cuba?
- Burkina Faso, at 36,740 t against 33,924 t in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Burkina Faso and Cuba?
- 2,816 t, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Cuba?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Burkina Faso and Cuba rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Burkina Faso ranks 78th and Cuba ranks 80th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).