Cabo Verde vs Gambia: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Cabo Verde
- Gambia
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 770.63 t against 727.91 t in Cabo Verde, a difference of 42.72 t.
That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times Cabo Verde's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Gambia ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 172nd and Gambia ranks 171st of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cabo Verde averaged higher in 2 and Gambia in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 171.56 t | 355.63 t | 184.08 t | Gambia |
| 1970s | 243.95 t | 529.33 t | 285.38 t | Gambia |
| 1980s | 571.52 t | 618.16 t | 46.65 t | Gambia |
| 1990s | 1,430 t | 745.8 t | 683.97 t | Cabo Verde |
| 2000s | 1,196 t | 898.62 t | 297.65 t | Cabo Verde |
| 2010s | 798.77 t | 897.53 t | 98.75 t | Gambia |
| 2020s | 717.15 t | 771.25 t | 54.11 t | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Cabo Verde or Gambia?
- Gambia, at 770.63 t against 727.91 t in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Cabo Verde and Gambia?
- 42.72 t, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Gambia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Gambia rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Cabo Verde ranks 172nd and Gambia ranks 171st of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).