Cambodia vs Czechia: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Cambodia
- Czechia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 73,730 t against 73,322 t in Cambodia, a difference of 408 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Cambodia ranks 60th and Czechia ranks 59th of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 2 and Czechia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 76,715 t | 124,419 t | 47,705 t | Czechia |
| 2000s | 84,976 t | 90,538 t | 5,562 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 81,289 t | 76,290 t | 4,999 t | Cambodia |
| 2020s | 75,518 t | 73,467 t | 2,050 t | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Cambodia or Czechia?
- Czechia, at 73,730 t against 73,322 t in Cambodia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Cambodia and Czechia?
- 408 t, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Czechia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Cambodia and Czechia rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Cambodia ranks 60th and Czechia ranks 59th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).