Cambodia vs Kyrgyzstan: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Cambodia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 73,322 t against 73,020 t in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 302 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Cambodia has been ahead every year.
Cambodia ranks 54th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 55th of 184 countries.
Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 76,197 t | 44,631 t | 31,566 t | Cambodia |
| 2000s | 84,976 t | 43,881 t | 41,095 t | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 81,289 t | 60,574 t | 20,716 t | Cambodia |
| 2020s | 75,518 t | 71,482 t | 4,035 t | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Cambodia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Cambodia, at 73,322 t against 73,020 t in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Cambodia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 302 t, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Cambodia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Cambodia ranks 54th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 55th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).