Cameroon vs Honduras: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Cameroon
- Honduras
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 33,843 t against 28,360 t in Cameroon, a difference of 5,483 t.
That makes Honduras's figure about 1.2 times Cameroon's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Honduras has been ahead every year.
Cameroon ranks 92nd and Honduras ranks 89th of 200 countries.
Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4,905 t | 20,845 t | 15,940 t | Honduras |
| 1970s | 9,498 t | 23,367 t | 13,868 t | Honduras |
| 1980s | 14,692 t | 23,261 t | 8,569 t | Honduras |
| 1990s | 16,287 t | 22,689 t | 6,402 t | Honduras |
| 2000s | 21,084 t | 30,700 t | 9,616 t | Honduras |
| 2010s | 26,564 t | 33,356 t | 6,792 t | Honduras |
| 2020s | 28,008 t | 33,605 t | 5,597 t | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Cameroon or Honduras?
- Honduras, at 33,843 t against 28,360 t in Cameroon as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Cameroon and Honduras?
- 5,483 t, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Honduras?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cameroon and Honduras rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Cameroon ranks 92nd and Honduras ranks 89th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).