Canada vs Mongolia: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Canada
- Mongolia
How they compare
Canada currently reports 235,282 t against 217,865 t in Mongolia, a difference of 17,417 t.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 23rd and Mongolia ranks 25th of 200 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 336,826 t | 83,451 t | 253,375 t | Canada |
| 1970s | 298,249 t | 93,696 t | 204,553 t | Canada |
| 1980s | 264,330 t | 98,699 t | 165,631 t | Canada |
| 1990s | 249,063 t | 120,211 t | 128,852 t | Canada |
| 2000s | 257,981 t | 109,135 t | 148,846 t | Canada |
| 2010s | 235,983 t | 156,966 t | 79,016 t | Canada |
| 2020s | 237,571 t | 218,167 t | 19,404 t | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Canada or Mongolia?
- Canada, at 235,282 t against 217,865 t in Mongolia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Canada and Mongolia?
- 17,417 t, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Mongolia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Canada and Mongolia rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Canada ranks 23rd and Mongolia ranks 25th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).