Caribbean vs Turkmenistan: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Caribbean
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Caribbean currently reports 120,789 t against 112,982 t in Turkmenistan, a difference of 7,807 t.
That makes Caribbean's figure about 1.1 times Turkmenistan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Caribbean ahead.
Caribbean ranks 44th and Turkmenistan ranks 47th of 200 groups.
Caribbean has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 97,670 t | 47,036 t | 50,634 t | Caribbean |
| 2000s | 105,923 t | 87,848 t | 18,075 t | Caribbean |
| 2010s | 113,483 t | 105,385 t | 8,097 t | Caribbean |
| 2020s | 116,850 t | 113,208 t | 3,642 t | Caribbean |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Caribbean or Turkmenistan?
- Caribbean, at 120,789 t against 112,982 t in Turkmenistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Caribbean and Turkmenistan?
- 7,807 t, with Caribbean ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Turkmenistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Caribbean and Turkmenistan rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Caribbean ranks 44th and Turkmenistan ranks 47th of 200 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).