Central African Republic vs Ukraine: Manure applied β Cropland potassium
Manure applied β Cropland potassium over time
- Central African Republic
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 184,997 t against 16,189 t in Central African Republic, a difference of 168,808 t.
That makes Ukraine's figure about 11.4 times Central African Republic's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ukraine has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 32nd and Ukraine ranks 29th of 32 groups.
Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8,694 t | 1.00 million t | 996,024 t | Ukraine |
| 2000s | 11,886 t | 476,138 t | 464,252 t | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 15,357 t | 299,932 t | 284,575 t | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 16,031 t | 215,210 t | 199,178 t | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied β cropland potassium, Central African Republic or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 184,997 t against 16,189 t in Central African Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied β cropland potassium between Central African Republic and Ukraine?
- 168,808 t, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Ukraine?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Central African Republic and Ukraine rank globally for manure applied β cropland potassium?
- Central African Republic ranks 32nd and Ukraine ranks 29th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).