Central America vs Kazakhstan: Manure applied β Cropland potassium
Manure applied β Cropland potassium over time
- Central America
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Central America currently reports 571,317 t against 207,340 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 363,977 t.
That makes Central America's figure about 2.8 times Kazakhstan's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Central America has been ahead every year.
Central America ranks 23rd and Kazakhstan ranks 26th of 32 groups.
Central America has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central America | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 362,038 t | 258,866 t | 103,173 t | Central America |
| 2000s | 457,577 t | 185,770 t | 271,808 t | Central America |
| 2010s | 512,758 t | 220,437 t | 292,321 t | Central America |
| 2020s | 561,131 t | 204,786 t | 356,345 t | Central America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied β cropland potassium, Central America or Kazakhstan?
- Central America, at 571,317 t against 207,340 t in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied β cropland potassium between Central America and Kazakhstan?
- 363,977 t, with Central America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central America and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Central America and Kazakhstan rank globally for manure applied β cropland potassium?
- Central America ranks 23rd and Kazakhstan ranks 26th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).