Chad vs South Sudan: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Chad
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 70,490 t against 70,475 t in Chad, a difference of 15 t.
Across all 12 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 58th and South Sudan ranks 57th of 185 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 45,985 t | 62,424 t | 16,439 t | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 64,718 t | 69,079 t | 4,361 t | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Chad or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 70,490 t against 70,475 t in Chad as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Chad and South Sudan?
- 15 t, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Chad and South Sudan rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Chad ranks 58th and South Sudan ranks 57th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).