Comoros vs Kiribati: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Comoros
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 173.47 t against 152.12 t in Comoros, a difference of 21.35 t.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Comoros's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Comoros ahead.
Comoros ranks 191st and Kiribati ranks 189th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 5 and Kiribati in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 96.77 t | 72.41 t | 24.36 t | Comoros |
| 1970s | 120.65 t | 77.16 t | 43.49 t | Comoros |
| 1980s | 123.14 t | 83.58 t | 39.56 t | Comoros |
| 1990s | 137.29 t | 90.64 t | 46.65 t | Comoros |
| 2000s | 144.97 t | 131.72 t | 13.26 t | Comoros |
| 2010s | 151.68 t | 160.92 t | 9.24 t | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 151.92 t | 172.08 t | 20.15 t | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Comoros or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 173.47 t against 152.12 t in Comoros as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Comoros and Kiribati?
- 21.35 t, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Kiribati?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Comoros and Kiribati rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Comoros ranks 191st and Kiribati ranks 189th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).