Costa Rica vs Greece: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Costa Rica
- Greece
How they compare
Greece currently reports 47,290 t against 47,123 t in Costa Rica, a difference of 167 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Greece ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 77th and Greece ranks 76th of 200 countries.
Greece has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Greece | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9,806 t | 89,551 t | 79,745 t | Greece |
| 1970s | 15,251 t | 89,725 t | 74,474 t | Greece |
| 1980s | 17,569 t | 73,157 t | 55,588 t | Greece |
| 1990s | 24,363 t | 64,615 t | 40,252 t | Greece |
| 2000s | 34,022 t | 63,896 t | 29,874 t | Greece |
| 2010s | 43,831 t | 57,321 t | 13,490 t | Greece |
| 2020s | 45,100 t | 46,543 t | 1,443 t | Greece |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Costa Rica or Greece?
- Greece, at 47,290 t against 47,123 t in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Costa Rica and Greece?
- 167 t, with Greece ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Greece?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Greece rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Costa Rica ranks 77th and Greece ranks 76th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).