Costa Rica vs Mali: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Costa Rica
- Mali
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 47,123 t against 40,998 t in Mali, a difference of 6,125 t.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Mali's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 77th and Mali ranks 80th of 200 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9,806 t | 9,276 t | 529.67 t | Costa Rica |
| 1970s | 15,251 t | 9,589 t | 5,662 t | Costa Rica |
| 1980s | 17,569 t | 11,159 t | 6,410 t | Costa Rica |
| 1990s | 24,363 t | 13,025 t | 11,337 t | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 34,022 t | 21,862 t | 12,159 t | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 43,831 t | 30,373 t | 13,458 t | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 45,100 t | 38,867 t | 6,234 t | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Costa Rica or Mali?
- Costa Rica, at 47,123 t against 40,998 t in Mali as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Costa Rica and Mali?
- 6,125 t, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Mali?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Mali rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Costa Rica ranks 77th and Mali ranks 80th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).