Cuba vs Paraguay: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Cuba
- Paraguay
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 33,924 t against 28,940 t in Paraguay, a difference of 4,984 t.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.2 times Paraguay's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 88th and Paraguay ranks 91st of 200 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 44,629 t | 10,142 t | 34,487 t | Cuba |
| 1970s | 45,502 t | 13,285 t | 32,218 t | Cuba |
| 1980s | 48,170 t | 20,311 t | 27,859 t | Cuba |
| 1990s | 44,831 t | 31,545 t | 13,286 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 39,331 t | 25,343 t | 13,988 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 38,070 t | 28,085 t | 9,985 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 30,819 t | 29,106 t | 1,713 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Cuba or Paraguay?
- Cuba, at 33,924 t against 28,940 t in Paraguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Cuba and Paraguay?
- 4,984 t, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Paraguay?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Paraguay rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Cuba ranks 88th and Paraguay ranks 91st of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).