Cyprus vs Jamaica: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Cyprus
- Jamaica
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 3,167 t against 2,772 t in Cyprus, a difference of 395 t.
That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Cyprus's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jamaica ahead.
Cyprus ranks 151st and Jamaica ranks 148th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 1 and Jamaica in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 608.44 t | 2,962 t | 2,353 t | Jamaica |
| 1970s | 1,280 t | 4,533 t | 3,253 t | Jamaica |
| 1980s | 1,976 t | 4,701 t | 2,725 t | Jamaica |
| 1990s | 3,316 t | 3,733 t | 416.37 t | Jamaica |
| 2000s | 4,022 t | 3,662 t | 360.36 t | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 3,356 t | 3,382 t | 26.57 t | Jamaica |
| 2020s | 3,066 t | 3,217 t | 150.24 t | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Cyprus or Jamaica?
- Jamaica, at 3,167 t against 2,772 t in Cyprus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Cyprus and Jamaica?
- 395 t, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Jamaica?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cyprus and Jamaica rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Cyprus ranks 151st and Jamaica ranks 148th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).