Czech Republic vs Kyrgyz Republic: Manure applied β Cropland potassium
Manure applied β Cropland potassium over time
- Czech Republic
- Kyrgyz Republic
How they compare
Czech Republic currently reports 73,730 t against 73,020 t in Kyrgyz Republic, a difference of 710 t.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Czech Republic has been ahead every year.
Czech Republic ranks 53rd and Kyrgyz Republic ranks 55th of 184 countries.
Czech Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czech Republic | Kyrgyz Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 124,419 t | 42,766 t | 81,653 t | Czech Republic |
| 2000s | 90,538 t | 43,881 t | 46,657 t | Czech Republic |
| 2010s | 76,290 t | 60,574 t | 15,716 t | Czech Republic |
| 2020s | 73,467 t | 71,482 t | 1,985 t | Czech Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied β cropland potassium, Czech Republic or Kyrgyz Republic?
- Czech Republic, at 73,730 t against 73,020 t in Kyrgyz Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied β cropland potassium between Czech Republic and Kyrgyz Republic?
- 710 t, with Czech Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czech Republic and Kyrgyz Republic?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czech Republic and Kyrgyz Republic rank globally for manure applied β cropland potassium?
- Czech Republic ranks 53rd and Kyrgyz Republic ranks 55th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).