Czechia vs Malawi: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Czechia
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 79,934 t against 73,730 t in Czechia, a difference of 6,204 t.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 59th and Malawi ranks 56th of 200 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 124,419 t | 4,538 t | 119,882 t | Czechia |
| 2000s | 90,538 t | 7,842 t | 82,696 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 76,290 t | 34,058 t | 42,232 t | Czechia |
| 2020s | 73,467 t | 72,186 t | 1,282 t | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Czechia or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 79,934 t against 73,730 t in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Czechia and Malawi?
- 6,204 t, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Malawi?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Malawi rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Czechia ranks 59th and Malawi ranks 56th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).