Czechia vs Nepal: Manure applied — Cropland potassium

Czechia
73,730 t
in 2023
Nepal
74,188 t
in 2023
Czechia rank
59th
Nepal rank
58th

Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time

  • Czechia
  • Nepal
25.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 74,188 t against 73,730 t in Czechia, a difference of 458 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.

Czechia ranks 59th and Nepal ranks 58th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Nepal in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Nepal Difference Ahead
1990s 124,419 t 72,043 t 52,376 t Czechia
2000s 90,538 t 83,400 t 7,138 t Czechia
2010s 76,290 t 101,846 t 25,556 t Nepal
2020s 73,467 t 99,717 t 26,249 t Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Czechia or Nepal?
Nepal, at 74,188 t against 73,730 t in Czechia as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Czechia and Nepal?
458 t, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Nepal?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Czechia and Nepal rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
Czechia ranks 59th and Nepal ranks 58th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
232 places, 13,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).