Czechoslovakia vs Viet Nam: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 280,672 t against 257,964 t in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 22,708 t.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.1 times Czechoslovakia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.
Czechoslovakia ranks 22nd and Viet Nam ranks 20th of 200 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 263,282 t | 112,776 t | 150,507 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 271,762 t | 110,182 t | 161,580 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 297,921 t | 140,827 t | 157,094 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 281,834 t | 166,106 t | 115,728 t | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Czechoslovakia or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 280,672 t against 257,964 t in Czechoslovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Czechoslovakia and Viet Nam?
- 22,708 t, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Viet Nam?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Viet Nam rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 22nd and Viet Nam ranks 20th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).