Djibouti vs Mauritius: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Djibouti
- Mauritius
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 680.25 t against 615.22 t in Mauritius, a difference of 65.03 t.
That makes Djibouti's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Djibouti has been ahead every year.
Djibouti ranks 175th and Mauritius ranks 177th of 200 countries.
Djibouti has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 190.99 t | 154.34 t | 36.65 t | Djibouti |
| 1970s | 267.33 t | 168.8 t | 98.53 t | Djibouti |
| 1980s | 409.28 t | 223.04 t | 186.24 t | Djibouti |
| 1990s | 580.68 t | 344.91 t | 235.77 t | Djibouti |
| 2000s | 656.76 t | 424.4 t | 232.36 t | Djibouti |
| 2010s | 670.81 t | 568.54 t | 102.27 t | Djibouti |
| 2020s | 678.38 t | 612.14 t | 66.24 t | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Djibouti or Mauritius?
- Djibouti, at 680.25 t against 615.22 t in Mauritius as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Djibouti and Mauritius?
- 65.03 t, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Mauritius?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Djibouti and Mauritius rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Djibouti ranks 175th and Mauritius ranks 177th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).